M&E Prompt Engine
M&E Prompt Engineering · 2026
PromptEval

#1 AI Prompt Builder — for Evaluation Professionals

The most advanced prompt engine for M&E — structured, evidence-grounded, hallucination-free. Built for MEAL practitioners across 90+ countries.

Free · No signup required · Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini & Copilot
300+
Expert Prompts
16
M&E Phases
100
SRS Templates
4
AI Platforms
Start from a template
Select one to pre-fill the form, then customise
Draft
1
Interpret — Role & Scope
Define the AI’s expert identity and analysis scope
2
Retrieve — Extract from Your Data
AI retrieves only what you provide — the anti-hallucination safeguard
SRS principle: AI extracts only what exists here. Missing data → “NO DATA: [indicator]”
0 / 50,000
Do not paste confidential or personally identifiable data. Use anonymised programme information only. Processed client-side.
3
Generate Analysis
Define analytical operations on retrieved data only
4
Generate Conclusions & Output Format
Define output structure and mandate explicit limitation statements
SRS always includes a LIMITATION clause to flag unsupported conclusions.

16 structured generators — one for every phase of the M&E cycle. Select a phase, complete the fields, generate and copy.

M
Select a phase above
Choose an M&E phase to load its prompt generator

300+ expert-curated prompts. Select a category, then a subcategory to explore.

Select a category above
Choose a category and subcategory to explore expert prompts for that M&E function.
300+
Prompts in library
16
M&E phases covered
4
SRS steps
4
AI platforms
SRS vs. basic prompting
Basic Prompt
“Write a Theory of Change for a health programme.”
  • Generic, non-contextual output
  • AI may fabricate data
  • No assumption testing
  • No limitations flagged
SRS Prompt
“Retrieve only from context. Map pathways. Mark testable assumptions. State LIMITATION where data is absent.”
  • Grounded in your programme data
  • Retrieval-constrained — no fabrication
  • Structured causal analysis
  • Transparent limitations
Real-world impact
Mid-sized INGO · 8 MEAL staff · 4 countries · 6-month SRS adoption
Before
9 hrs
per lessons learned report
After SRS
25 min
per report · 8.7/10 quality
Annual saving
~$40-70k
67% fewer donor feedback loops
Practitioner Guide — PDF
Full SRS guide with worked examples, templates, and field notes.
Download PDF
01
Step 1
Interpret — Role & Scope
Assign a specific expert identity. Constrains the AI to specialist output, eliminating generic responses.
Role: Senior M&E specialist, ToC development, fragile contexts.
Scope: Girls’ education, rural Kenya. Analysis: Pathway mapping.
02
Step 2
Retrieve — From Context Only
“Do not add” is the anti-hallucination safeguard. Absent data returns “NO DATA” — not an invented value.
Extract only: (a) explicit activities, (b) outputs, (c) outcomes.
Do not add outcomes not explicitly listed.
03
Step 3
Generate Analysis
Calculate changes, identify trends, group findings — from retrieved data only. No external knowledge added.
Map causal pathways. For each: identify assumptions.
Mark testable vs. untestable. Flag logic gaps.
04
Step 4
Generate Conclusions
Mandate explicit limitations. “LIMITATION: [missing info]” separates SRS from ordinary prompting.
Present as: (1) narrative, (2) pathway, (3) assumptions table.
LIMITATION: state all unsupported conclusions.
The core SRS principle

SRS separates what the AI knows from what your data says. Step 2 (Retrieve) is the critical gate: by prohibiting additions and mandating “NO DATA” flags, you eliminate confabulation and produce outputs traceable to your actual programme evidence.

Full example — Theory of Change prompt
SRS Example
PromptEval by EvalCommunity · v4 · 2026
We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.

Cart

Your cart is currently empty.

LAND A JOB REFERRAL IN 2 WEEKS (NO ONLINE APPS!)

Sign Up & To Get My Free Referral Toolkit Now: